| Appendix B: Figures
Figure 1. San Francisco Bay and the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, showing
the sampling sites for trace elements used in the RMP and prior pilot
studies.

back to Introduction back
to top
Figure 2. RMP station clusters for each sampling event based on all trace
elements.

back to Spatial
Stratification back to top

back to Spatial
Stratification back to top

back to Spatial
Stratification back to top

back to Spatial
Stratification back to top

back to Spatial
Stratification back to top

back to Spatial
Stratification back to top
Figure 3. RMP station clusters for each trace element based on all sampling
events 7-15.

back to Spatial
Stratification back to top

back to Spatial
Stratification back to top

back to Spatial
Stratification back to top

back to Spatial
Stratification back to top

back to Spatial
Stratification back to top
Figure 4. Total trace element distributions mapped in UTM coordinates.
Each map corresponds to a single element and single RMP sampling event.
The are af each square is proportional to the concentration, expressed
as a fraction of the largest value found in each sampling event.
back to Regional Differences back
to top

back to Regional Differences back
to top

back to Regional Differences back
to top

back to Regional Differences back
to top

back to Regional Differences back
to top

back to Regional Differences back
to top

back to Regional Differences back
to top

back to Regional Differences back
to top

back to Regional Differences back
to top

back to Regional Differences back
to top
Figure 5. Moran scatterplots for each trace element during sampling event
13. The dashed line is the linear regression line. The solid line is the
least trimmed squares regression line. Three points are designated by
their station codes rather than by circles. These have the three most
negative residuals with respect to the least trimmed squares line.

back to Causal Mechanisms back
to top

back to Causal Mechanisms back
to top

back to Causal Mechanisms back
to top

back to Causal Mechanisms back
to top

back to Causal Mechanisms back
to top

back to Causal Mechanisms back
to top

back to Causal Mechanisms back
to top

back to Causal Mechanisms back
to top

back to Causal Mechanisms back
to top

back to Causal Mechanisms back
to top
Figure 6. Time series of trace element totals for RMP stations during
1991-1995

back to Temporal Trends back
to top

back to Temporal Trends back
to top

back to Temporal Trends back
to top

back to Temporal Trends back
to top

back to Temporal Trends back
to top

back to Temporal Trends back
to top

back to Temporal Trends back
to top

back to Temporal Trends back
to top

back to Temporal Trends back
to top

back to Temporal Trends back
to top

back to Temporal Trends back
to top
Figure 7. Trends in trace element totals during 1991-1995. Upright triangles
represent uptrends and inverted triangles represent downtrends. Weaker
trends (p>0.1) are designated by small triangles, stronger trends (p</=0.1)
by large triangles.

back to Temporal Trends back
to top

back to Temporal Trends back
to top
Figure 8. Total cadmium vs. Net Delta Outflow. The straight line in each
panel is a linear regression fit.

back to Adjusting
Data back to top
Figure 9. Time series of total cadmium after removing the effects of
net Delta Outflow (NDO) through linear regression.

back to Adjusting
Data back to top |