Contents
Introduction
A Mass Budget Model for PCBs in San Francisco Bay
Findings
Recommendations
References
Tables
Table 1
Table 2
Figures
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Download PDF version |
Introduction
The mission of the Chlorinated Hydrocarbon Workgroup (CHCWG) was to develop
recommendations for a Regional Monitoring Program (RMP) sampling design
that optimally meets the objectives of the Program with regard to chlorinated
hydrocarbons (CHCs) and to provide a formal justification for the recommended
design. Following the guidance of the Five Year Review panel (Bernstein
and OConnor, 1997), these recommendations were based on:
- RMP data and data from other continuing and historical studies.
- mass balance models developed to guide redesign.
- a clear linkage of the design with RMP objectives and management
questions.
Based on priorities defined by the Technical Review Committee, the primary
focus of the CHCWG was on PCBs.
This report summarizes the recommendations of the CHCWG and provides
a summary of the formal justification for the recommendations. The justification
is presented in the form of Findings of the Workgroup and explanatory
text accompanying the specific recommendations.
The CHCWG was comprised of experts on CHCs in San Francisco Bay and two
prominent scientists from outside the region (Eisenreich and Gobas) who
have extensive experience in CHC fate and transport in the Great Lakes
(Table 1). Significant technical contributions were
also made by Andy Gunther of Applied Marine Sciences and Dave Schoellhamer
and Sam Luoma of the U.S. Geological Survey. Many others also attended
and participated in discussions at the two workgroup meetings.
At the first CHCWG meeting in July 1998, local data on CHCs from the
RMP and other programs were summarized. The CHCWG agreed with the Review
Panels recommendation on the importance of developing a mass budget
model for PCBs in order to evaluate the likelihood of continuing inputs
of PCBs to the Bay and to understand response times in the Bay. The CHCWG
provided guidance on the type of model to use to SFEI staff, who then
developed the model. Results of the modeling were presented and discussed
at the second meeting in December 1998, and provided a foundation for
the recommendations developed at that meeting. A summary of the modeling
effort is provided below. A more detailed report on the modeling exercise
will be prepared this summer.
back to top
A Mass Budget Model for PCBs in San Francisco Bay
The objectives of the mass budget modeling effort were to estimate inputs
of PCBs to the Bay and the response time (rate of change in concentrations
under different management scenarios) of the Bay for PCBs. The CHCWG recommended
development of a one-box model for the whole Bay as a first step in understanding
the PCB mass budget. The use of a modeling framework developed by Mackay
et al. (1994) and further refined by Gobas et al. (1995, 1998) was recommended
by the Workgroup. Figure 1 illustrates the processes
included in the model.
Although the principal concern over CHCs in the Bay is due to their accumulation
in fish, piscivorous wildlife, and humans, the model does not include
a food web component, primarily because of the limited information available
on the diets of the fish species used in monitoring and on the diets of
their prey. The model predicts concentrations of PCBs in sediment and
water over time. Until a food web component can be added to the model,
it can be assumed that PCB trends in the food web would be similar to
those predicted for sediment and water.
Extensive data on PCB concentrations in the Bay generated by the RMP,
the Bay Protection Program (Hunt et al., 1998), and other programs were
used as input for the model. The best data on trends in PCB concentrations
indicate that no significant decrease occurred from 1982 to 1996, suggesting
that the Bay has been at a steady state with loads balancing losses. Reliable
data on PCB loads to the Bay are very sparse, but losses from the Bay
could be estimated using the RMP database on sediment and water concentrations.
If the Bay has been at a steady state, then loads must have been of a
similar magnitude as the losses. PCB loads to the Bay were therefore estimated
by quantifying PCB losses from the Bay.
Important pathways for PCB loss from the Bay include outflow through
the Golden Gate, burial in deep sediment, and volatilization (Figure
1). Approximately 20 kg/yr are estimated to leave the Bay via each
of these pathways. Degradation probably has an insignificant effect on
the budget. Losses from the Bay are therefore estimated to total approximately
60 kg/yr, and this is considered to also be a reasonable estimate of inputs
to the Bay.
Response times of the Bay were estimated using solutions to the mass
balance equations. The sensitivity of the model to each input parameter
was assessed by running the model with ranges of values of the input parameters.
Using the best available estimates of each input parameter, if loads to
the Bay were eliminated the total mass of bioavailable PCBs in the active
sediment layer (which accounts for 98% of the total) would be predicted
to decrease from approximately 450 kg to approximately 150 kg over a 10
year period (Figure 2). The model indicates that
loads of 25 - 50 kg/yr could significantly delay reductions in the mass
of bioavailable PCBs in the Bay (Figure 3).
It should be acknowledged that the estimates produced by the model are
crude approximations. The model is based on estimated values of Baywide
annual averages of many input parameters that are often uncertain and
highly simplified characterizations of complex features and processes
in the Bay. A more detailed treatment of the uncertainty of the model
will be provided in the detailed report.
In spite of these weaknesses, the mass budget model does provide several
benefits. The model provides a framework for organizing our knowledge
of PCBs in the Bay. Although the model estimates are uncertain, this uncertainty
can be reduced as better information becomes available. The modeling exercise
has helped identify parameters that have the strongest influence on the
PCB budget and response times and parameters for which improved estimates
would yield the greatest improvement in understanding of PCB fate in the
Bay.
As an example, the depth of the active layer of sediment is a critical
input parameter, not only for PCBs but for other contaminants that are
predominantly particle-bound in the Bay. The depth of this layer has a
strong effect on the mass of contaminant available to the food web and
the rate of decline in PCB concentrations (Figure 4).
Rates of decline in PCB mass in sediment over a 10 year period in the
absence of loads to the Bay are predicted to be 44% for an active layer
of 15 cm, 67% for an active layer of 7 cm, and 90% for an active layer
of 3 cm (Figure 4). The "best" estimate
of 7 cm is based on data gathered by USGS for one sampling area in Richardson
Bay (Fuller et al., 1999). A Baywide average active sediment depth is
difficult to estimate because of the spatial and temporal heterogeneity
of Bay sediment, the very limited data available, and the abstract nature
of the concept. Clearly, more information on this parameter is needed.
back to top
Findings
Finding 1: Chemical measurements demonstrate that CHCs are adversely
impacting beneficial uses in the Estuary.
RMP water sampling has frequently found concentrations of PCBs, DDTs,
chlordanes, and dieldrin that exceed various water quality objectives.
For trace organics, the water quality objectives are based on human exposure
through consumption of contaminated fish. PCB concentrations have exceeded
the water quality objective in almost every sample analyzed. For example,
43 of 53 samples in 1997 exceeded the 170 pg/L objective (SFEI, 1999).
Other trace organics exceeded objectives less frequently in 1997: DDTs
in 11 of 53 samples, chlordanes in 6 of 54 samples, and dieldrin in 23
of 52 samples.
Chemical monitoring of fish tissue in the RMP confirms the concern raised
by the water data for human exposure through consumption of contaminated
fish. RMP fish sampling began in 1997, following a pilot study conducted
in 1994 (Fairey et al., 1997) and the issuance of a health advisory for
consumption of fish from San Francisco Bay (OEHHA, 1994). The advice was
issued due to concern over human exposure to residues of methylmercury,
PCBs, dioxins, and organochlorine pesticides in Bay-caught fish. This
interim advisory remains in place after completion of the second round
of sampling in 1997 (SFEI, 1999). PCBs exceeded the screening value in
51 of 72 Bay samples (Figure 5). Dieldrin, DDT,
and chlordane had lower numbers of Bay samples above screening values:
27 of 72 for dieldrin, 16 of 72 for DDTs, and 11 of 72 for chlordanes.
Studies of piscivorous wildlife in the Bay have also found concentrations
of CHCs indicative of possible adverse impacts. Concentrations of PCBs
in double-crested cormorants (Davis et al., 1997; Davis, 1997) and harbor
seals (Young et al., 1998) appear to be high enough to impair the health
of these species. The cormorants and seals rely almost exclusively on
Bay fish for their diet and are therefore much more highly exposed to
food web contaminants than humans.
back to
top
Finding 2: Annual changes in concentrations of CHCs in the Bay are likely
to be small.
Long-term trend data available for CHCs in the Bay indicate that PCB
concentrations have been decreasing very slowly. The most complete long-term
time series exists for trace organics in transplanted mussels, which have
been deployed in the Bay since 1980 under the California State Mussel
Watch (SMW) Program for 1980-1993 and the RMP for 1994-present (Gunther
et al., 1999). PCB concentrations showed no perceptible change from 1982
to 1996 (Figure 6). The most recent data (for 1997)
were lower; continued sampling will be required to determine whether the
1997 results are indicative of a long-term decline.
Sampling of other matrices also suggests that PCB concentrations are
declining very slowly in the Bay, and are not even one order of magnitude
lower than peak concentrations in the late 1960s. A few data are available
on water column concentrations of PCBs from the 1970s (Risebrough, 1997)
and early 1980s (Jarman and Davis, 1997). Both Risebrough (1997) and Jarman
and Davis (1997) conclude that PCB concentrations measured by the RMP
in recent years are roughly equivalent to the older data.
Risebrough (1997) also presented data on CHCs in shiner surfperch collected
from the Bay in 1965, and these can be compared to shiner surfperch data
collected in 1994 (Fairey et al., 1997) and 1997 (SFEI, 1999; Table
2). The recently measured PCB concentrations are approximately 20%
of those measured over 30 years ago. The decline for DDTs has been greater,
with recent concentrations only 3-5% of 1965 values.
Venkatesan et al. (1999) measured CHC concentrations in dated sediment
cores from two locations in the Bay that provide chronologies spanning
several decades and also indicate very gradual long term-declines. In
the San Pablo Bay core, which was less affected by mixing than the Richardson
Bay core, maximum PCB concentrations were found in sediments deposited
around 1970 and were about 2.5 times higher than concentrations in surficial
sediments deposited around 1990 (Figure 7). While
these data indicate a clear decrease, the magnitude of the decrease is
lower than might be expected given the longstanding restrictions on PCB
use. In contrast, DDT concentrations in this core declined from a maximum
of 57 ng/g dry in sediment deposited around 1965 to 6 ng/g dry in surface
sediments deposited around 1990. It is also noteworthy that most of the
drop in CHC concentrations in these cores occurred in a short span after
the peak concentrations, with a more gradual decline thereafter.
In addition to the empirical evidence of slow rates of decline, available
data on sediment mixing suggest that sediment CHC concentrations would
be slow to respond to changing inputs. Fuller et al. (1999) analyzed radioisotopes
in the Richardson Bay and San Pablo Bay sediment cores to examine chronologies
of deposition and mixing. They estimated for the Richardson Bay core that
82% of a 1-year pulse input of contaminated sediment would remain in the
mixed zone 20 years after deposition.
back to
top
Finding 3: There are probably continuing inputs of PCBs and other CHCs
to the Bay from local tributaries, major rivers, atmospheric deposition,
and point sources.
The PCB mass budget modeling described previously led to the conclusion
that inputs must have existed in order to explain the lack of decrease
observed in bivalves from 1982-1996. If the Bay was indeed at a steady
state for this period, then inputs of approximately 60 kg would have been
required to balance the estimated losses from the Bay.
The changing PCB fingerprints (congener ratios) observed in RMP water
sampling (Jarman et al., 1997) provide additional evidence of "fresh"
inputs to the Bay. For example, Central Bay samples in July 1996 had a
distinct fingerprint of Aroclor 1248, especially at Red Rock (BC60) and
the Golden Gate (BC20). The lower chlorinated congeners found in Aroclor
1248 would not be expected to persist in the Bay over the long term, nor
would the fingerprint of a specific Aroclor be expected to be distinctly
apparent after years of mixing in the Bay.
The persistence of PCBs combined with their widespread use in the watershed
further suggest the likelihood that PCBs are continuing to enter the Bay.
Due to their resistance to electrical, thermal, and chemical processes,
PCBs were used in a wide variety of applications (e.g., in electrical
transformers and capacitors, vacuum pumps, hydraulic fluids, lubricants,
inks, and as a plasticizer) from the time of their initial commercial
production in 1929 (Brinkmann and de Kok, 1980). In 1979, a final PCB
ban was implemented by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S.
EPA), prohibiting the manufacture, processing, commercial distribution,
and use of PCBs except in totally enclosed applications (Rice and OKeefe,
1995). A significant amount of the world inventory of PCBs may still be
in place in industrial equipment (Rice and OKeefe, 1995). Local
U.S. EPA staff estimate that of the 1.5 billion pounds of PCBs that were
produced, about 5%, or 8 million pounds, are still in use, mostly in electrical
transformers (Brandon Carter, U.S. EPA, personal communication). Pacific
Gas and Electric (PG&E), one of the primary historic users of PCBs
in the Bay Area, has essentially eliminated use of PCB capacitors and
transformers, but does still have a large amount of equipment containing
PCB residues as a contaminant (parts per million concentrations) from
the production process (Victor Furtado, PG&E, personal communication).
Many other industries also used PCBs in many other products. Leakage from
or improper handling of such equipment has led to widespread PCB contamination
of industrial areas. A significant portion of the Bay shoreline and watershed
is industrialized, and PCB contamination has been identified at many sites
in the watershed.
Mass budget studies in other aquatic ecosystems have identified tributary
inputs, atmospheric deposition, and point sources as primary pathways
of PCB loading (Marti and Armstrong, 1990; Mackay et al., 1994; Pearson
et al., 1996; Nelson et al., 1998). These same categories are the primary
potential pathways to the Bay. The CHCWG divided tributary inputs into
inputs from the major rivers (the Sacramento and San Joaquin rivers) and
local tributaries (including storm drains) that flow directly into the
Bay.
Knowledge of PCB uses and monitoring data suggest that local tributaries
could represent a significant pathway for continuing PCB input to the
Bay. Drainage from industrial areas with high PCB contamination potential
would primarily enter the Bay via local tributaries. Sediment sampling
under the Bay Protection Program (Hunt et al., 1998) and the RMP has frequently
found high PCB concentrations at the points where local tributaries enter
the Bay (Figure 8).
Atmospheric deposition could be a significant source to the Bay. The
urban plume (Holsen et al., 1991; Simcik et al., 1997; Zhang et al., submitted)
of the San Francisco peninsula would often sit right on the Bay, and local
climatic conditions (fog, a turbulent air/water interface) could enhance
air/water exchange of contaminants. Also suggestive of the importance
of local atmospheric deposition are PCB concentrations in fish from San
Pablo Reservoir that are comparable to those in Bay fish (Myrto Petreas,
Cal/EPA, personal communication) in spite of no known sources in the local
watershed.
The Sacramento and San Joaquin rivers appear to transport moderate masses
of PCBs to the Bay and probably relatively large masses of DDT and other
organochlorine pesticides. RMP sampling has found typical concentrations
of approximately 250 pg/L total (dissolved + particulate) PCBs at the
Rivers stations (BG20 and BG30). Combining this concentration with annual
average Delta outflow yields an average annual mass load of 7 kg/yr.
This value probably is an underestimate of loads from the rivers, since
particle-associated contaminants such as PCBs are transported principally
during runoff events early in the wet season and these short duration
events are generally not captured by RMP sampling. One possible exception
was in January 1997, when RMP water sampling coincided with a record runoff
event. Using PCB concentrations and Delta outflow measured at this time
an instantaneous mass load of 19 kg/yr is obtained.
In contrast to many other contaminants, total (dissolved + particulate)
PCB concentrations at the rivers and Northern Estuary stations were not
elevated during the Big Storm. This suggests that the sediment particles
washing into the Estuary from the Central Valley were relatively uncontaminated
with respect to PCBs. This observation is consistent with previous observations
of relatively low TSS-normalized concentrations of PCBs at the Northern
Estuary and Rivers stations (Jarman and Davis, 1997). Nevertheless, in
spite of these low concentrations and an apparently diluted signal of
PCB contamination, events with high flows and sediment transport can still
lead to significant mass loading from the Rivers. Given the large amounts
of flow and sediment transport involved, mass loading from the Rivers
could potentially be a significant component of the PCB mass budget and
should be carefully estimated. Potential sources of PCBs in the Central
Valley include both areas with industrial development and hydroelectric
power generation facilities (CVRWQCB, 1987).
Total (dissolved + particulate) chlordanes and DDTs were among the contaminants
that were elevated in the northern reach in the January 1997 sampling.
Total DDT concentrations at the rivers were the highest yet observed for
these stations in the RMP. Total DDT concentrations were also elevated
in January at the Northern Estuary stations. Total concentrations of dieldrin
and chlordanes at the Northern Estuary stations were the highest yet observed
for these stations in the RMP. The high dissolved + particulate concentrations
of DDTs, chlordanes, and dieldrin in the Northern Estuary suggest significant
transport of contaminated sediment particles from the Central Valley during
the high flows in January. Research by USGS (Kratzer 1998) has documented
transport of substantial quantities of particle-associated organochlorine
pesticides from tributaries to the San Joaquin River. Other studies have
found widespread organochlorine contamination throughout the Central Valley.
PCB loadings from point sources are probably a minor component of the
overall budget. Very few reliable data are available on trace organics
concentrations in point sources. A few effluent samples were recently
analyzed by the City of Palo Alto (Torke 1998) and concentrations ranging
from 200 to 3,000 pg/L were detected. If these concentrations are assumed
to be typical of Bay Area publicly owned treatment work (POTW) effluents
in general, then these effluents are accounting for 0.1 to 2.0 kg/yr of
PCB input to the Bay.
Overall, although more information is needed on all of the pathways for
PCB input to the Bay, the largest data gaps exist for loads from local
tributaries and atmospheric deposition.
back to top
Finding 4: Transplanted bivalves and the eggs of piscivorous birds are
powerful tools for monitoring long-term trends in CHCs. CHC concentrations
in fish tissue can be more variable and therefore less valuable for detection
of long- term trends.
Due to the strong tendency of CHCs to accumulate in biota, especially
at the top of the food web, biomonitoring is a very effective tool for
these contaminants. The use of bivalves for monitoring long-term trends
in CHCs was strongly endorsed by the CHCWG. Bivalves are valuable for
the strong signal they provide of CHC contamination in the Bay (Gunther
et al., 1999), their temporal integrating capacity, the existence of a
long term database (Gunther et al., 1999), and their dynamic equilibration
with environmental contamination (Russell and Gobas, 1989). Lipid normalization
is an effective way to remove the influence of varying lipid content in
bivalves. Bivalves are also useful for spatial comparisons, though this
advantage has been limited in the RMP because of the limited salinity
tolerances of the species used.
Analysis of organochlorines in piscivorous bird eggs has produced the
most reliable and powerful data set for long-term trend monitoring in
the Great Lakes (Stow, 1995, Hebert et al., 1997, Haffner et al., 1997;
Hughes et al., 1998; Hebert, 1998; Pekarik and Weseloh, 1998). Piscivorous
birds are high trophic level integrators of food web contamination, their
eggs are easy to collect (minimal sampling costs), and the colonies and
eggs are reliably present (in contrast to fish).
Given the regulatory importance of concentrations of CHCs in fish, trends
in fish tissue need to be monitored. Fish are not as good as bivalves
or avian eggs, however, at indicating long term trends. In the Great Lakes,
trends in fish have been more variable and harder to interpret than trends
in other components of the ecosystem (Madenjian et al., 1994; Stow, 1995b;
Stow et al., 1995, 1997). As an example, Stow et al. (1995b) estimated
that sample sizes in the range of 1000-2000 fish would be required to
detect future reductions in PCB concentrations in Lake Michigan because
of the high variability in PCB concentrations among individuals. CHC concentrations
in fish can fluctuate with changes in food web structure (Kidd et al.,
1995, 1998) and with seasonal variation in lipid content. Lipid normalization
does not completely remove the influence of variable lipid content, because
concentrations in fish lipid are slow to equilibrate with environmental
concentrations (Frank Gobas, Simon Fraser University, personal communication).
back to top
Finding 5: The RMP is underestimating contamination in the Bay by focusing
on chemicals that are no longer in use.
Uses of most CHCs measured in the RMP were subject to heavy restrictions
or bans since 1972 for DDT, 1979 for PCBs, 1987 for dieldrin, and 1988
for chlordane. Continued monitoring of the CHCs is clearly needed. However,
the CHCs have been replaced by other pesticides, insulators, and flame
retardants that are required to be highly toxic and/or persistent in order
to serve their purpose. Few of the chemicals that are currently in heavy
use and are of potential concern in the Bay are currently monitored by
the RMP.
back to top
Recommendations
The Findings presented above provided the basis for recommendations by
the CHCWG on how to design the RMP to satisfy the objectives and management
questions established for the Program. CHCWG recommendations were explicitly
tied to RMP objectives and management questions. The CHCWG assumed that
the budget available for the RMP would remain approximately equal to its
present level, so recommended additions to the Program were accompanied
by recommendations of elements that could be reduced.
These recommendations have already been distributed and reviewed, so
they are presented below in a condensed form, but in the same format that
was used previously.
Sources, Pathways, and Loadings
The group agreed that there are probably continuing inputs of PCBs and
other CHCs to the Bay from local tributaries, the major rivers, atmospheric
deposition, and point sources. The greatest emphasis in evaluating loadings
should be placed on the largest potential sources. Where possible, existing
data should be compiled to help identify the largest potential sources
and pathways. For example, existing data on possible loads from the Sacramento
River should be evaluated (including transport of contaminated sediments
during large sediment transport events). Other types of information that
could help identify sources and pathways should also be considered, such
as PCB fingerprints, PCB/DDT ratios, and fugacity comparisons.
The group recommended a phased approach to begin to evaluate loadings
of contaminants to the Bay from local tributaries (including storm drains).
- Review existing information to identify drainages with the
greatest potential for continuing CHC inputs.
The size and contamination potential of the drainage area should be
considered. Existing data on sediment contamination at the mouths of
storm drains and tributaries (i.e., Bay Protection Program data) should
be reviewed. Other sources of information on CHC contamination in the
drainages (e.g., locations with documented PCB contamination) should
be also be reviewed.
- Survey local watersheds to determine potential continuing sources.
The RMP should sample sediment and bivalves at the outlets of local
tributaries and storm drains where existing data are not sufficient
to indicate whether the tributary carries contaminated sediment. Drainage
areas that are continuing sources would have higher concentrations of
CHCs in sediment and bivalves at these outlets. Sampling should be performed
at the upper end of the tidal prism (where applicable) at the end of
the rainy season. Compositing would allow wide spatial coverage at the
outlets.
- Sample sediments upstream in the tributaries.
Sediments in the upstream portions of the creeks or storm drains should
be sampled to confirm the presence of contamination and to possibly
locate the sources of contamination more precisely. The group recognizes
that this may be beyond the realm of the RMP, but recommends that this
step be taken by whoever is the appropriate entity.
- Measure loads from largest potential sources.
Good flow data are essential to estimating loadings, so load estimates
should be made on tributaries where these data are available. Load measurements
should be made in collaboration with USGS, using USGS methodologies.
Hydrologic events should be sampled as appropriate to capture the large
fluxes of suspended matter that can occur during storms.
Data from sediments at the outlets of some local tributaries are already
available, and some indicate possible upstream sources of contamination.
At these locations steps 2 and 3 could be initiated on a pilot study basis.
Steps 2 and 3 do not need to be sequential. For example, the RMP could
begin a pilot study measuring loads (as described in #3 above) from Coyote
Creek, where sampling in the upper reaches of the tidal prism (Estuary
Interface Pilot Study) and at the San Jose station (C-3-0) has detected
high PCB concentrations.
back to top
Water
- Replication is crucial in evaluation of spatial or temporal trends.
Some degree of replication should be incorporated as a routine part
of the Base Program. At a minimum, duplicate samples should be collected
at one station in every sampling cruise. Ideally, side-by-side sampling
should be performed to allow estimation of the variance of collection.
If this is not possible, other alternatives should be considered, such
as collecting a second sample right after a first sample.
- Field recovery, measured by using two samplers in series, should be
evaluated on a routine basis for dissolved organics.
- Implicit in the preceding two recommendations is the recommendation
that the RMP obtain or gain access to another water sampler.
- Sampling frequency: Available information indicates that annual changes
in concentrations of CHCs in the water column are likely to be small.
Three cruises per year are therefore not necessary for long-term trend
monitoring. Since documenting seasonal variation is not stated as a
priority in the RMP Objectives, Focusing Questions, and Management Questions,
three cruises are not necessary for that purpose either. Annual sampling
of the water column is recommended.
- Spatial array: The focusing and management questions both express
interest in comparison of embayments. Based on this, the group agreed
that the target data for the Base Program was a representative annual
average contaminant concentration for each embayment. A rigorous statistical
approach should be followed to determine the minimum number of sampling
sites and optimal arrangement within each embayment that would yield
a good estimate of the annual average concentration for each embayment.
Jassby et al. (1997) provide an example of this type of analysis. The
array should include new stations in the "shallow margins"
to address the focusing and management questions about comparing the
spine and shallows.
- One of the management questions calls for linking trends in inputs
with trends in the Bay. For water, the group thought that measuring
trends in inputs is more important than trying to detect trends in the
Bay, where the signal is blurred by mixing with past deposits. Measurements
along the "spine" are an excellent way of tracking Bay-wide
trends.
- An eventual goal should be to develop a mass budget model for each
embayment that could be used as a management tool to predict the likely
responses to regulatory actions within each embayment.
Bivalves
- The use of bivalves for monitoring long-term trends in CHCs was strongly
endorsed by the group and should be continued.
- The possible value of replication in the bivalve sampling should be
evaluated.
- Due to the broad scope of the CHCWG meeting, it was not possible to
have a detailed discussion on the bivalve sampling. Further aspects
of the design of the bivalve component (transplants versus residents,
alternate species, etc.) were left to another group.
back to top
Fish
- Trends in fish tissue should continue to be monitored. The existing
plan calling for sampling of fish every three years is reasonable, given
the recommended emphasis on other matrices for long-term trend monitoring.
- Information on the diet composition and trophic position of the monitored
fish species are needed to evaluate long-term trends and understand
interspecies differences in contaminant accumulation. Measurement of
nitrogen isotopes would be a relatively inexpensive way of evaluating
trophic position of the fish species, and might provide a way of detecting
shifts in food web structure over time. The simultaneous declines observed
from 1994-1997 in several Bay species might be due to a change in food
web structure. Characterization of the portions of the Bay food web
that include the monitored species is needed.
Eggs of Piscivorous Birds
- Annual monitoring of concentrations of organochlorines and other
persistent bioaccumulative contaminants in double-crested cormorant
eggs from colonies on the Bay should be added to the RMP. Cormorants
are recommended for several reasons: they are resident; they eat Bay
fish almost exclusively; and they have been the subject of organochlorine
studies in the Bay and elsewhere.
Sediment
- As with water sampling, replication is important and should be
incorporated as a routine part of the Base Program. Collecting and analyzing
replicate grabs would be best. Replicate sampling performed for the
Pilot RMP and in 1994 should be reviewed prior to deciding how much
replication is needed.
- As with water, sediment sampling should be reduced to once each year.
The resources saved by reducing the frequency of sampling should be
re-allocated to more extensive spatial sampling. The more extensive
spatial sampling would be done to address the focusing and management
questions about comparing the spine and shallows and to provide information
on possible loads of CHCs from local tributaries (i.e., step 1 of the
"local watershed survey" described under Water).
- Detection limits for sediment CHC analyses should be low enough to
obtain quantitative data from all samples, or we will compromise our
ability to detect temporal or spatial trends. To generate results that
can be considered quantitative, the MDLs of the methods employed should
be about one-third of the concentrations in field samples with low concentrations.
Our current sediment MDLs are not low enough.
back to top
Air
- The group did not discuss the Atmospheric Deposition Pilot Study specifically,
but the potential significance of atmospheric deposition of PCBs was
acknowledged, indicating the value of the Pilot Study. Steve Eisenreich
of the CHC workgroup provided detailed comments on the Pilot Study workplan
to Pam Tsai.
Selection of Analytes
- The CHCWG agreed that it would be valuable for the RMP to gather information
on the many chemicals that are in current use, in contrast to the CHCs
which have all been banned for one, two, or three decades. On behalf
of the CHCWG, Bob Risebrough has prepared written suggestions for approaching
this problem. The writeup is attached (titled: Observations of Similarities
Between Bird-Watching in Amazonian Peru with a California Check-List
and the Reporting of Organic Contaminants in the RMP: Suggestions for
a Long-Term Approach). In short, Dr. Risebrough and the CHCWG are proposing
a special study that would employ a post-doc to analyze existing chromatography
data (generated by the RMP but not analyzed) to identify some of the
many large unknown peaks. This special study would address the management
question asking which contaminants should be monitore
|