|
ABSTRACT
As
a result of a 1994 San Francisco Bay Regional Water Board
study, the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment
issued an interim health advisory for people consuming fish
from San Francisco Bay. This interim advisory remains in effect.
In 1997 the Regional Monitoring Program for Trace Substances
in the San Francisco Estuary (RMP) and the Sacramento River
Watershed Program (SRWP) began monitoring fish contamination
in the Bay and on the Sacramento River (River).
RMP
sampling in 1997 targeted seven species that are frequently
caught and eaten by Bay fishers and seven popular fishing
areas in the Bay (Figure 1). Persistent
toxic chemicals in Bay fish remained at concentrations of
potential human health concern. Mercury exceeded a human health
screening value in 44 of 84 Bay samples (Figure
2). All collected samples of leopard shark and striped
bass exceeded the mercury screening value. White catfish from
the Sacramento River also had relatively high mercury concentrations.
Rainbow trout from the northern Sacramento River had the lowest
mercury concentrations among the species sampled.
Concentrations
of PCBs and other trace organics were highest in white croaker
and shiner surfperch, the two species with the highest fat
content in their muscle tissue. PCBs exceeded the screening
value in 51 of 72 Bay samples (Figure 3).
All of the white croaker and shiner surfperch samples exceeded
the screening value for PCBs. Dieldrin, DDT (Figure
4), and chlordane had lower numbers of Bay samples above
screening values: 27 of 72 for dieldrin, 16 of 72 for DDTs,
and 11 of 72 for chlordanes. Rainbow trout from the northern
Sacramento River watershed had relatively low concentrations
of organic contaminants. White catfish from the Sacramento
River had relatively low lipid content but moderately high
wet weight concentrations.
Dioxins
and dibenzofuran TEQs in all seven Bay samples analyzed exceeded
the screening value of 0.15 ng/g wet weight. Dioxin-like PCBs
accounted for 83% of the overall dioxin-like potency in these
fish samples.
Significant
variation in contaminant concentrations among Bay locations
was observed. Oakland Harbor had significantly elevated wet
weight concentrations of mercury, PCBs, DDTs, and chlordanes.
Length-adjusted mercury concentrations were relatively high
at Oakland Harbor and S.F. Waterfront. Lipid normalized concentrations
of PCBs, DDTs, and chlordanes, and dieldrin were elevated
at Oakland Harbor.
Mercury
concentrations in the Bay in 1997 were not significantly different
from concentrations in 1994. Statistically significant declines
in concentrations from 1994 to 1997 were observed for PCBs,
DDTs, chlordanes, and dieldrin. Dioxin ITEQs also showed a
statistically significant decline from 1994 to 1997. Continued
monitoring will be required to establish whether the declines
observed are real indications of declining masses of contaminants
in the Bay or due to variation in other factors.
Removal
of skin from white croaker fillets reduced concentrations
of PCBs, dieldrin, DDT, chlordane, and dioxins by 33 to 49%.
Inroduction
As
a result of a 1994 San Francisco Bay Regional Water Board
study, the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment
issued an interim health advisory for people consuming fish
from San Francisco Bay. This interim advisory remains in effect.
In 1997 the Regional Monitoring Program for Trace Substances
in the San Francisco Estuary (RMP) and the Sacramento River
Watershed Program (SRWP) began monitoring fish contamination
in the Bay and on the Sacramento River (River). In 1998 sampling
was performed for a one-time study of fish tissue contamination
in the Delta, funded primarily through the Deltakeeper. Data
from these three efforts can be pieced together to provide
a broad overview of fish tissue contamination in much of the
watershed of the San Francisco Estuary.
The
primary objectives of all three of these efforts have been:
1)
to determine whether persistent toxic chemicals occur in fish
that are being used as human food at concentrations of potential
human health concern, and
2)
to provide data that are useful in tracking long-term trends
and evaluating the effectiveness of management efforts to
improve water quality.
|